Excavations on the island of Sai reveal how Egyptian occupiers became good neighbours
They came by boat, bringing cooking utensils, crockery and all the other necessities needed for life in a strange land. That is how Julia Budka imagines the arrival, around 1539 BC, of the first Egyptian administrators in the new town on the island of Sai in the Nile. They were far from home, for the settlement lay in Nubia, between the river’s 2nd and 3rd cataracts. Following the final conquest of the whole of the African kingdom of Kerma by the Pharaoh Thutmose III, Egyptian expansion to the south continued, and the island’s location made it an ideal jump-off point. River traffic could be effectively controlled from here, and Egypt’s armies could be supplied with everything they needed to consolidate their hold. For Nubia was the primary source of gold and other valuable resources from Sub-Saharan Africa for the Egyptian state.
After a few years of service there, they would be replaced and could return home. Budka, however, is interested in how the Egyptian settlers who came to the island in the course of the colonization of Nubia made their homes there. In 2012 she received one of the European Research Council’s coveted Starting Grants (worth just under 1.5 million euros) for her 5-year project AcrossBorders.
This relief in Deir el-Bahari (Luxor) shows Thutmose III [Credit: Julia Budka] |
To uncover the effects of intercultural interactions in Ancient Egypt, she set out to answer the following questions: Did the Egyptians on Sai live in the same fashion as their compatriots at home? What impact did the presence of the native Nubian population have on their daily lives? Conversely, what impact did Pharaonic culture have on local traditions? Now, after 5 years of research, during which she spent several months annually in Sudan and Egypt, Budka can assert that “despite the central role of the Egyptian state, a hybrid lifestyle is discernible in occupied Nubia.”
Prejudice and accommodation
When the first colonial administrators arrived on Sai, the island was completely lacking in infrastructure. “In the beginning, they were totally dependent on Egypt.” But they had brought their own anxieties and prejudices with them. They had misgivings about the locals which are often reminiscent of the negative attitudes that we moderns tend to harbor towards representatives of other cultures.
And so, little by little, the Egyptians and the Nubian locals learned to live and let live. However, the daily lives of the first generations of Egyptians, and their relationships with the surrounding population must have been marked by distrust and continuing conflict with the partisans of the former kingdom of Kerma. But when the resistance had been subdued, the town experienced a sudden economic boom. “I am convinced that this was possible only because a deal was made with the locals, and the occupiers correspondingly adapted.”
The stone shabti is inscribed with the name of the first occupant of the tomb – the master goldsmith Chnummose [Credit: Julia Budka] |
The tomb of the master goldsmith
The finds made so far suggest that the better-off sections of the population of Sai rapidly embraced the Egyptian way of life and became indistinguishable (in the archaeological record) from the “real” Egyptians. For example, they adopted Egyptian funerary customs and venerated Egyptian gods, including the Pharaoh. In addition to the extensive town area, there are Egyptian-style cemeteries on the island, the earliest of which goes back to the time of Thutmose III.
Unfortunately, only traces of the painted blue-and-yellow decoration have been preserved, as the tomb was at some stage inundated with groundwater. Perhaps the most exciting find was a stone statuette depicting a so-called shabti or servant for the afterlife. Because shabtis typically bear the name of the deceased, the occupant could be identified as the master goldsmith Khnummose. The tomb is thought to have been built for him, and it thus contains the mortal remains of members of a family that was directly involved in one of the town’s principal functions – the mining and processing of gold.
The wooden coffin has disintegrated, probably as a result of flooding, but this heart-shaped stone scarab was found nearby [Credit: Julia Budka] |
This question can be answered by measuring the levels of different isotopes of the element strontium which is incorporated into bones and teeth and provides insights into the composition of the individual’s diet. If ancient DNA can be recovered from the skeletal remains found in Tomb 26, it should throw light on the genetic relationships between those buried in it. Budka now awaits the results of the DNA analyses underway at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena.
“It was thought that by the time of Ramesses II, about 300 years after the founding of the town, the center of Egyptian administration in the area had moved to the town of Amara West. But these finds conclusively demonstrate that Hornakht’s residence was located on Sai and that he was buried there.” Furthermore, Budka strongly suspects that Hornakht was born on Sai and that other members of his family also held important positions in the Egyptian administration, although they were natives of the town.
A ring made of silver and gold found in Tomb 26 [Credit: Julia Budka] |
Moreover, it is still not clear why the Egyptians abandoned Sai. But there must have been a specific reason for the decision, for our British colleagues at Amara West have shown that the site was far from ideal and was itself forsaken within a relatively short time. Living conditions there were very difficult, and people suffered greatly from the unrelenting northerly wind.”
Source: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen (LMU) [July 21, 2017]
Comments
Post a Comment